Thinking is not only a human brain’s functional characteristic, it is the man’s privilege before being his right. Meaning that I have the privilege to think, elaborate and formulate my thought(s) before having the right to speak them up out loud in public freely and by any mean of communication.
For many years, alas, under the mask of the research for efficiency; to change the ‘sense’ of the constitution has become the objective. To convert its sense from a solid instrument for Democracy into a Guarantor of Oligarchy.. Oligarchy is The Régime of Inequality.
Being an instrument for Democracy obliges the constitution, among many other things, to protect, observe and defend the characteristics of a Democracy, being the Governance as diffused and understood by ‘Many’.. Characteristics like: equality, social justice, protecting the weak and whom the crisis emarginated, transparency of power and responsibility of the ruler.
On the other hand, reducing the constitution into a guarantor of the Oligarchy, means supporting a Régime of inequality, privilege, corruption and irresponsible hidden powers; meaning to protect and defend a government concentrated among the ‘Few’ who will always defend themselves against any form of change. Hence they would do everything to “Rationalise the Institutions”.. In an Oligarchic sense.
When a power system is at risk, it would automatically react according to the instinct of survival. In that context any reform it may be forced to provide would inevitably be the hostile moves of counter-reform.
That is why, and above all, we should ask first whoever is (or has been) assigned to bring changes onto the constitution: Which authority gave you the mandate?
Because the dominant mentality among such ‘pseudo-constituents’ is that before the many difficulties and accumulated discredit, the rulers (and their pseudo-constituents nominees) instead of changing themselves, accuse the constitution. It is the fault of the Constitution!
For they refuse to realise that they were chosen to be under, not above, the Father of The Laws; and they want to educate us that the intended “Institutional and Constitutional reforms” have the objective of “simplifying and rationalising neutral methods for good governance”.
As things have developed, we are rather convinced that they intended to change the constitution to “Normalise” a new form of Oligarchic Governance; in the hope that we’d finally surrender and accept their interpretations of Democratic Change.
Well as I see it, what they’ve proposed so far is, if not worse, the same as what we’ve already had for many years.. That’s why we must grow enough to form a massive critical block which it would be not possible to consider.Pass On The Word.