The dawn must come.

The dawn must come.

Friday, 25 November 2011

Political and Intellectual Prostitution.

By Ahmed M. EL NAHAS, November 25th 2011.
You know of course that among the essential pre-conditions set for any government to merit loans from international financial institutions, like the “International Monetary Fund” (IMF) or the “World Bank” (WB), is what you will find in their “Structural Adjustments Programs” (SAP) in the labour section under that vague grey title: “Flexibility”; presented as a necessity to “re-launch the economy and guarantee the growth”!!!
In case you don’t know what that is, allow me to briefly point out that the term refers to imposing the complete subordination and submission of the “Employee” to the “Employer”. In other words an employer may lay off (fire) any number of employees at any given moment almost without prior notice and totally free from any sort of liabilities. Clear now?
But that’s not all! “Flexibility”, in any SAP’s protocol’s footnotes would also require:
·         Reducing the lay time notice to 30 days,
·         Dismissing the employee with “Scarce or Low Personal Performance” thus denying him the constitutional protection of the “Just Cause” right, and
·         Eliminating any possibility for the employee to seek justice in tribunal against “Arbitrary Dismissal”.
One more detail will be added as of next April, bringing the necessary work period, for an employee that enables him a justifiable case in tribunal against his employer, to two consecutive uninterrupted working years instead of one.
Well, with the existing complicated interlaced spider web galaxy of contractual terminologies, types of contracts and conditions which prevailed through the labour market over the past decades, you can imagine the results. No employee will have the chance to obtain for himself and his family an open contract to secure a future, and no labour dispute will ever cross the threshold of a tribunal.
Productivity, competitiveness and quality are not my issue here. My concern is what has been, and is still going on in Egypt; for I have no recollection whatsoever of any politician or intellectual to have ever even raised an inquisitive eyebrow in face of the clamorous paradox which I will phrase in the following simple question: “How can free dismissal create new jobs?”!!! Logic evades my comprehension.
Professional politicians in flagrant collusion with a “Régime” who domesticated intellectuals over the past sixty years, have certainly betrayed the nation by allowing such continuous denial for our basic citizenship rights; and no matter what their reasons were, I would simply brand them as defectors from their mission of “Guiding” and “Enlightening”. Those are the ones who turned their eyes and remained silently watching while the Constitution was systematically being raped. The very same individuals who consumed their repeated mandates voting in parliament to allow tailor made electoral bills with their regulatory norms to pass over decades and deafened by the orchestrated applause of intellectuals on TV, in films, in songs, in newspapers, in schools and almost everywhere.
Now you want to vote in the coming elections with the same laws and regulations under the same constitution for the same faces and you hope for a different outcome?
My third grade elementary school science teacher, the Honourable Monsieur Cilontos, always reminded us that “Matter would convert and mutate but it never perish”, like when you boil the water.. It may disappear from the pot but it remains exactly in its same identical volume but in a different shape, in vapour.
So these parasitic opportunists, they may change the pin on their jackets, they may refine their linguistic skills, they may dress in casual jeans or unbutton their shirts, but they will remain the very same short-sighted small persons who will surf on the wave crest for as long as permitted to do so.
Without “Purge”, by any possible way and mean, a “Revolution” will remain a crushable “Rebellion” that will never be able to change things or hope to achieve the minimum acceptable thrust to make any kind of political, economic or social reforms.
Mr. Mohammad Hassanein Heikal in an interview with Mr. Fahmy Howeidy last February rightly said: “Those looking for a role to play in the NEW should seek support in their actual proven share of active participation and commitment to induce and impose the CHANGE, not on their long history of submissive subordination to the OLD and their continuous compromising failures to defy or even oppose it”.
Valiant men of honour like Ghandi and Mandela taught humanity that:
Changes can come from the power of the MANY, but only when the many come together to form that which is invincible.. The Power Of ONE”.

P.S.: Years ago when I was younger, and more foolish, while performing a Managerial role with multinational firms; I did use that cruel sword of “Easy Dismissal”.. As my ambition obscured my reason in two occasions, I admit and confess that I was wrong, and I am profoundly sorry for that.  

Pass On The Word.

Thursday, 24 November 2011


By: Ahmed M. EL NAHAS – Italy, November 23rd, 2011.

It sounded more like a defying threat, rather than an empowering promise. That is the impression I have had while following the carefully written “address”, yet poorly delivered by an expired Field Marshall Tantawy, to the angry and desperately unemployed youth decided to continue to roar all over the country hoping that one day someone or somebody would hear and listen to their reasons, without shamelessly turning the other side avoiding to hear their moans from the floods of purple streaming along the streets of Egypt.
They are socially frustrated, economically devastated and hopelessly lacking trust for a better future; and yet the Field Marshall appears on unified national networks to say exactly what they didn’t wish to hear.. The same void speeches they were born under their pounding spells and rigidly observed rituals; comprising of the following endless défilé of “experts”, whom in my humble opinion are not much of experts, would exhibit their “Narcissism” on the same screens while chewing some mysterious gray words, of which even they don’t know the real meaning; then shamelessly cash some money, our money, and return happily to their homes without bothering to “address” the substantial merit of the issue.
An issue that, I have already kept explaining ever since I decided to leave the country back in the late nineties of last century, when I started analysing various CFR reports on “Political Instability in Egypt”.. The nucleus of that issue, just in case that you forgot, is  the definition of our Republic!
If we insist on being a “Presidential Republic”, instead of a modern “Democratic Parliamentary Republic”, then we are definitely in bound to procuring another dictator. We tried it for 60 years and here we are at square one, with exactly the very same unrests as in the forties after WWII, which led to the 1952 military Coup d’Étât. Will it need a century for us to understand its demerits and hazards?
Once a Republic is deprived from a solid “Permanent Constitution” voted and approved by all political fractions, social movements, institutions and organisations, and protected by an “Independent Legislative Authority” under a vigilant “Transparent Free Press”, then its destiny is doomed and damned.
The set of priorities as presented by that Field Marshall, head of the ruling “Supreme Council of the Armed Forces”, and easily swallowed by most if not all the “Professional Political Parties”, are shuffled in a way to serve certain private gains in concert with high foreign concerns only interested in Egypt’s total submission to an imposed agenda that has nothing to do with the people’s grieves. That is why all those handsome and well groomed faces appearing on the screens, keep preaching the necessity to go to the elections in a couple of weeks span on purpose, so that we get ambushed in the same “Poacher’s Trap” once again, after which they will collect and cash the cheques.
The day after we may wake up euphorically happy thinking that we have scored the points for an “Historic Peaceful Victory” over a strong giant opponent, though not realizing that the headache we think is a hang-over from last night festivities is simply the result from that vicious “Knock-Out” we received and that we have already lost the encounter.
Going to vote with such a “Porcellum” called Electoral Law will produce nothing but a crippled Parliament with no real “Monitor and Control” powers over the Executive, and we will have once more our Dictator, in suit or in uniform.
Do you really believe that  such crippled creature born to that kind of law could furnish a “Solid Permanent Constitution” designed for a “Free Democratic Parliamentary Sovereign Republic”?
Good Morning Isramerica!

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Mercy and Pardon for them.. Scourge and Damnation for us?

Ahmed M. EL NAHAS – November the 9th 2011

United States president Barack Obama dictated certain “limitations” to the power at the disposal of Israel saying: “Israel's navy can intercept weapons shipments from Iran, Israel's Military Intelligence can expose Hamas long-range missile tests from Gaza, but at least for the time being, as long as the international community is conducting dialogue with Tehran over its controversial nuclear program, it is best that Israel doesn't do too much…”  to annoy the adults!

But that was in 2009 when the Obama administration’s priorities were completely different. So the unsatisfied Israel had to force things towards its own strategic ends, as it always do, and plans were made to speed events forward, so that now we can see the American diplomats lobbying through the UN and NATO corridors to get support for heavier sanctions on Iran and tighter embargo in the Mediterranean and the Arabian sea and Gulf; all such actions totally sponsored by Obama himself, thus clearly there is an Isramerican agreement not only on the necessity to strike Iran, but as well on every detail related to the offensive executive action: when, how, who will do what, and where. And such public outings exhibited by the American president should not be discarded as “elections times banners”. We must consider the possibility that they are an essential chapter in a well conceived plan to launch a preventive war against Iran, a plan designed ever since the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah War (called the Second Lebanon War in Israel).

But why the rush?.. Let me guide you in a step by step tour through that maze of interlaced schemes carefully designed to distort our vision and deviate our attention from the main event lying in the centre of that maze, a massive quick strike against Iran either by Israel and later on the United States (remember the Sèvres war plot of 1956 resulting in the Tripartite assault over Egypt), endorsed by a tighten NATO/EU/US embargo (which is already on course as you will see) leading to a final target and that is to weaken Iran’s armed forces, destroy its nuclear capabilities and possibly overthrow its “Islamic Rule”.

Hezb’Allah was always the “thorn in the flesh” of Israel keeping it for a long time on tenter-hooks, so something must be done to neutralize such pain. Hence the Rafick El Hariry assassination, and when in time the International Criminal Court guided rule would increase the pressure labeling the resistance movement a Terrorist Organisation.

Also something must be done to neutralize Syria and prevent it from supplying Hezb’Allah with Iranian weaponry increasing Lebanese resistance offensive capabilities, and here a three folds scheme was devised:

Ø  First: to force Syria out of Lebanon through a quick staged war putting Lebanese armed forces against the Syrians under the lights of an orchestrated international media campaign. And that was achieved little less than a decade ago.

Ø  Second: to establish a Mediterranean/Red Sea embargo fishing for anything that can be used as arms of any kind to be connected somehow to the Syrian government, and tie Syria to Hezb’Allah and Hamas. The interception of hundreds of tons of weapons, believed to be an Iranian shipment meant for Hezbollah, in the Mediterranean wasn't any different from similar operations carried out by the U.S. Navy, twice this year, though Israel seized a significantly larger amount of weapons. Therefore, the display of the loot the IDF invited everyone to see at the Ashdod port received a lukewarm welcome by the world media saying “it is great that Israel is uncovering and seizing ‘Iranian’ weapons”. the world leaders must be telling themselves, but is there anything here that we didn't know well before the Israeli commandos raided the Antigua-flagged ship in the middle of the night?

Ø  Third: to create internal unrests and hopefully to overthrow the Syrian régime, in order to loosen the Iranian connection with resistance movements in the region, mainly Hezb’Allah and Hamas (both qualified by Israeli and sympathising international media as “Terrorist Organisations”. Well, we all know where from did the revolution winds blew first in Syria. Out from Deraa, that poor little Syrian town lying at the foot of the occupied Golan Heights. An ideal place to plant sleepers and recruit local assets to use the new winds blowing over the region to surf over the “Arab Spring” revolutionary tidal wave sweeping the Middle East.

Parallel to that, an effort must be exercised to discredit Iran’s image and create the alibi for the final assault. And here comes the same Isramerican “déjà-vu” and  repeatedly rehearsed script. Exaggerated news and intelligence reports (like Iran’s presumed intention to assassinate a Saudi Ambassador) are being systematically published, on regular media and specialised reviews all over the world, analysing Iran nuclear threat. All aiming at escalating fear and acquiring an international public opinion favourable to “any necessary mean”. Here are some of these stories:

Ø  “The Iranians have equipped and paid for, and trained, a massive unguided rocket and guided missile force in Lebanon (the largest such force in human history). These missiles are in-place as a MAD force (a MAD ~ mutually assured destruction ~ force is one that is a doomsday force; established to prevent the use of overwhelming military force by allowing a return ‘punch’ of overwhelming military destructive force upon one's enemy). The total number of missiles and rockets in Lebanon are variously estimated at between 40,000 and 110,000. While many are unguided Katyusha rockets, many are longer ranged guided missiles. All are operated by Hezbollah Special Forces launch teams”.

Ø  “The Hezbollah Special Forces are in-effect a highly trained and well-equipped Iranian commando force of at least a Brigade in size. They man and protect a large number of mostly unguided and rather crude rockets, generally Katyusha 122mm artillery rockets with a 19 mile/30km range and capable of delivering approximately 66 pounds/30kg of warheads. Additionally, Hezbollah are known to possess a considerable number of more advanced and longer range missiles. During the 2006 war Hezbollah fired approximately 4,000 rockets (95% of which were Katyushas) all utilizing only ‘dumb’ high explosive warheads. Some Iranian build and supplied Fajr-3 and Ra'ad 1 liquid-fueled missiles were also fired. It is believed that the larger and longer range missiles are directly under the control of Syrian and Iranian officers”.

Ø  “The Syrians had purchased (and supplied to Hezbollah) a large number of very nasty, relatively low cost Russian AT-14 Kornet solid fuel anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM) and the Iranian trained Hezbollah commandos dug in massive numbers of concrete bunkers and firing positions”.

Ø  “Israel will face a truly massive number of rockets and missiles from Lebanon with radiological, chemical, biological and FAE (fuel air explosive) weapons of mass destruction warheads”.

Ø  “Additionally, a sizable number of such weapons/warheads will be fired from Gaza and the West Bank. The Syrians will be using larger more accurate guided missiles to shower WMD upon Israel as will the Iranians. To counter this, the Israelis will be using their Green Pine Radar system and a combination of Israeli and American anti-missile missiles. They will have good success in knocking down many incoming missiles but the sheer number of incoming weapons will totally overload all defensive measures.  Large parts of Israel will be contaminated with radiation with extremely long half-lives (many tens of thousands of years in some cases), with a mix of chemical, FAE, and biological nightmares thrown in for good measure. Total deaths will amount to one-third to one-half of the Israeli population with a large additional number being injured”.

Ø  “The combination of short to medium range rockets and guided missiles in Lebanon, and the longer range guided missiles in Syria, the smaller number of rockets and missiles in the West Bank and Gaza, and the longer range guided missiles in Iran present a massive throw weight of warheads aimed at Israel”.

Ø  “Iranian sleeper teams in North America and western Europe will begin to "seed" the populations of these areas with a number (perhaps in the several dozens) of different man made killer viruses. People in movie theaters, churches, synagogues, shopping malls, subway stations, airports, etc., will be exposed without anyone knowing it at the time, to these advanced biowar viruses. About nine to ten days later the computer reporting systems in the western countries will begin to report back strange illnesses. That will trigger a host of measures to contain the advanced bio-war viruses but it will simply be too late to prevent a massive outbreak of horrific illnesses”.

Trafficking such nonsense will procure public consensus to the case, and once the public opinion is conquered, some additional tactical moves must be undergone to convince Iran that it is not a bluff, and that they are playing the hand and Iran must see the call. To start Israeli press has become fixated on stories that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is considering a military attack on the Iranian nuclear program. Some very reputable Israeli journalists are reporting that the prime minister and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, are pushing the cabinet to vote in favor of an attack. On November 2nd 2011, the day marking the 94th memory of the Balfour Declaration, Israel tested one of its long-range missiles, adding to the tension.

Nahum Barnea, one of Israel’s best and most respected reporters, reported on Haaretz subsequent news on a large Israeli Air Force training exercise late October that took place on the Italian island of Sardinia, in which IAF long-range fighter bombers practiced an extended-range attack plan with the Italian, German, and Dutch air forces.

Israel have lately test-fired one of its Jericho missiles, which can hit targets all over Iran. And on September 23rd president Obama secretly approved the transfer of “Bunker Buster Bombs” to Israel. And the Pentagon, with the Israeli Military Intelligence, have carefully chosen the primary targets for the USAF and Israeli bomber groups to hit in Saghand and Yazd: the Uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, a heavy water plant and radioisotope facility in Arak, the Ardekan Nuclear Fuel Unit, the Uranium Conversion Facility and Nuclear Technology Centre in Isfahan.

Now that this massive interlaced plan have brought Iran and its allies in the region, especially Syria and Hizb’Allah, under enormous pressure from the international community on a number of fronts: Iran for allegedly plotting to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington; Syria for killing thousands of its own citizens in the Arab Awakening; and Hizb’Allah for murdering former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Hariri in 2005; the International Atomic Energy Agency is due to publish a new report on Iran’s nuclear program this month, which could ratchet up the issue further; I can tell that you would agree with me that it’s nothing but a revised and refined Iraq scenario. Only this time excluding the invasion and ground assault bit.

Bear in mind that such complex schemes, requiring consolidated and well orchestrated logistic and intelligence efforts: in that case the Pentagon and European allies together with the various Israeli Intelligence Agencies; did not materialize overnight, but simmered for quite some time.

Now that we’ve reached the end of our tour, a vigilant observer may notice that all the above would inevitably threaten some vital national interests of other nations like Russia, china, Saudi Arabia, Europe, and most the region’s countries from the Mediterranean costs to the Arabian Sea and Gulf. So, the doubt is legitimate and the question will no longer be limited to the “If” or “When”.. It would certainly become: “Could a similar tactical preventive strike get out of control and cut loose getting wider bringing in others into the battle-field?”.

Which brings me back to the title parable, or “Why is it a right for the ‘West’ to obtain and control modern technology (nuclear, chemical and biological whether used for peaceful or belligerent applications), and not Iran for instance? Is it only a Jew’s discovery monopolised by Christian and pagan ‘civilisations', denied to whomever failing to meet their pre-set criterion to obtain and use it? Especially Muslims?”.

And don’t say a word about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, it is just the exception to prove the rule.. And it is bound to become the next stop. Only if the present one remains limited to the “Conventional War” status!

Pass On The Word.

Saturday, 12 November 2011

Die Samson and all the Philistines.

Ahmed. M. EL NAHAS, 11th November 2011

The Israeli government keeps only one option in play: the Military!! The same one that Peres rejected back in 2006.
No one ignores what will happen the moment Israeli bombers will take off in bound for their mission in Iran:
Ø  Hezb’Allah militias will put north of Israel under fire,
Ø  the UNIFIL forces, head-quartered in south Lebanon and protected by Hezb’Allah will flee the territory,
Ø  Iraq and Afghanistan will be destabilised,
Ø  The gulf area will boil or worse burn,
Ø  The gulf of Hormuz will be closed, and
Ø  The oil barrel prices will jump from $90 to over $200.
In Israel they know well the biblical Epic of Samson,  who prayed God to give him strength to avenge himself from the “Philistines”, and thus he destroyed the “House” with him in it shouting his immortal say: “die Samson with all the Philistines”!
Those preaching and lobbying for the war on Iran, from their cross Atlantic heated offices, are already forecasting the fortunes to cash out of that war along with their sponsoring firms of greedy multinational military industries and war technology; and have gathered a solid fearful public opinion convinced of the necessity of such a war.
Convenient when you’re  entertaining friends at home from a “Secure Distance” far away from jeopardy and danger. But is it the case of those living in the Middle East and especially  in Israel? Is there so many willing to commit such an absurd act of SUICIDE?
Pass On The Word.

Friday, 11 November 2011

They preach Stability, but the intent is: Compliance!

Condensed by A. M. El Nahas,
from Mr. James Rothenberg’s article of May 26th 2010

What are the United States doing in Afghanistan? According to U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, “the Administration together with the Congress are working to complete our mission”. Mission is a carefully chosen word. Used in this sense by propagandists, it connotes purpose, goodness, unity, and suggestively…etc, etc! Here one must stop, because once you accept the premise that the U.S. have a mission in Afghanistan, you are sufficiently indoctrinated, and your attention can be safely turned away from the mission itself onto its details, things like strategy, tactics, timing, resources, and flexibility.

the War in Afghanistan a “complex issue” what makes the issue complex is the way Washington must represent the situation and keep the public in line with the programme: to frighten, therefore the inevitable scare talk about protecting the country from terrorists (in lieu of a truly formidable enemy) and, in general, cultivating enemies (Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela), the one thing that is indispensable to the Pentagon.

If one accepts the State Department’s definition for “terrorists”, limiting it to non-state actors, the U.S. is conveniently exempt. This certainly answers the question of why no government officials will be considered terrorists, but it is hardly because of the popularly accepted notion of innocence. State terrorism is violence on a scale, like the “Shock and Awe” tactics in Iraq, that is not approachable by non-state actors.

The point is not that small scale terrorism has a place because large scale terrorism exists. That is simply a fact. The point is to oppose all forms of terrorism, wherever it emanates from.

the real mission, actually obliquely referred to here by Schumer: "We can achieve victory in Afghanistan when we have an environment that is conducive to economic development and most importantly when the Afghans have a security infrastructure that permits them to independently fight off and neutralize the Taliban insurgency in that country".

If the U.S. are not interested in helping Cuba’s economic development, 90 miles away from its shore, why would it care about Afghanistan, halfway around the world?

All the troops, all the missiles, all the Predator drones are there to bring Afghanistan under American dependence, consolidating U.S. presence in the oil and gas rich Caspian Basin with its geopolitical significance toward potential enemies Russia and China, and encircling Iran. America is fighting them “over there” not so it doesn’t have to fight them “over here”, but because that’s where the oil and gas are.

The vaunted “stability” that Washington yearns for in foreign countries has nothing to do with stability. What country has been more stable than Cuba for the past 50 years? Stability in the State Department sense means “compliance” with U.S. instructions, access for U.S. investment, access to the country’s raw materials, and the necessary military basing these entail. The cheapest asset of U.S. multinationals is the U.S. military, serving to protect foreign investment with costs of blood and limb, paid for in full by the commons.

In the U.S. military, the strong are used to get the weak. Careers are advanced by sealing off potential damage from above, for example, then Major Colin Powell in Vietnam, the subject being “possible U.S. atrocities”. If all the truth were known, the responsibility in Afghanistan rests with those who give orders, ultimately, Washington.

Pass On The Word.

And the song remain the same..

Ahmed M. EL NAHAS – November th3 8th 2011.

·       Back in December 2005, Israel’s drums of war sounded so loud that it could be heard on Mars. By then the prime minister Ariel Sharon ordered Israel’s armed forces to prepare for air strikes on uranium enrichment sites in Iran (Times (London), Dec 11, 2005).

·        On December 9, Israeli Minister of Defense, Shaul Mofaz, affirmed that in view of Teheran’s nuclear plans, Tel Aviv should “not count on diplomatic negotiations but prepare other solutions”. (La Jornada, Dec. 10, 2005).

·        In early December, Ahron Zoevi Farkash, the Israeli military intelligence chief told the Israeli parliament (Knesset) that “if by the end of March, the international community is unable to refer the Iranian issue to the United Nations Security Council, then we can say that the international effort has run its course” (Times, Dec. 11, 2005). In plain Hebrew, if international diplomatic negotiations fail to comply with Israel’s timetable, Israel will unilaterally, militarily attack Iran.

·        Benjamin Netanyahu, then leader of the Likud Party and candidate for Prime Minister stated that if Sharon did not act against Iran, “then when I form the new Israeli government (after the March 2006 elections) we’ll do what we did in the past against Saddam’s reactor”. (Times Dec 11, 2005).

·        All top Israeli officials have pronounced the end of March as the deadline for launching a military assault on Iran. The thinking behind this date is to heighten the pressure on the US to force the sanctions issue in the Security Council. The tactic is to blackmail Washington with the “war or else” threat, into pressuring Europe (namely Great Britain, France, Germany and Russia) into approving sanctions.

Now, in November 2011, the scenery has changed quite a bit. And as both the American and Israeli strategic interests are seriously defied by the growing “instability” throughout the Arab world, thus a war must take the stage and sedate the region for a while, until the new deck of cards is shuffled and prepared for a new hand to be dealt in an absurd endless game on the table of the Big Ones.

The United States have almost evacuated Iraq and does not fear for a heavy body count in its ranks like those days back in 2005, Europe is facing a tremendous economic crisis threatening to serve the entire old continent to the IMF for breakfast, Israel needs to overcome its losses (prisoners exchange, the declaration of Palestine as an active member of UNESCO, the surrounding “revolutions” among neighbouring countries, the Turkish/Arab/Iranian rapprochement…etc) with a flagrant gesture to distort and deviate international and regional attention from the real target: “secure the region’s resources by one single blow under its full control and on behalf of (or with) a powerful friend (USA), using the consent of needy allies (an economically suffering Europe).

The outcome of a flash “Preventive/Pre-emptive Attack” scenario would be:
Ø  Weakening the Iranian economy through political isolation, sanctions and cutting provisions from Russia and China,
Ø  Obliterating Iran’s nuclear programmes,
Ø  Destroying Iran’s infrastructure,
Ø  Reducing Iran’s military capabilities to the minimum permitted defensive levels,
Ø  Removing the Hezbollah threat(*) once and for all, and destroy its missile and rocket launchers in Lebanon,
Ø  Discouraging Arab countries from any kind of friendly relations with Iran, and destabilizing the ones who maintain close relations with it like Syria,
Ø  Mobilising the Iranian mass against the régime and place a “friendly moderate” government,
Ø  Increasing political pressure over Turkey and reactivate the Euphrates Water negotiations,
Ø  Ensuring an internal political victory for the Likud and secure the second term,
Ø  Maintaining the role of the “Only Caretaker” of Western interests in the Middle East & North Africa,
Ø  Tightening the grasp over the American decision making centres to increase the pressure over the White House to endorse and support Israel policy, and
Ø  Securing its undeclared role as the only trustworthy and reliable partner in the “One World Government  Corporation”, aka the “New World Order”.

That’s not the entire story. As history repeats itself, you may further elaborate on the Isramerican declared “reasons” aiming to convince the world that “a preventive/pre-emptive strike in Iran is legitimate and is the only resourceful solution to make peace prevail”!!

So stay around and.. Pass On The Word.

(*)According to Israeli official intelligence reports, the Hezbollah Special Forces are in-effect a highly trained and well-equipped commando force of at least a Brigade in size. They man and protect a large number of mostly unguided and rather crude rockets, generally Katyusha 122mm artillery rockets with a 19 mile/30km range and capable of delivering approximately 66 pounds/30kg of warheads, and a considerable number of more advanced and longer range missiles.

In the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah War (called the Second Lebanon War in Israel), After over 50 Merkava main battle tanks were hit, and the high tech American made warplanes and pinpoint weapons proved ineffective, Israel had to chose to either use neutron bombs (a type of nuclear weapon that produces a higher short term radiological output and less blast output than normal nuclear weapons) or lose a large number of Israeli solders to remove the Hezbollah threat; or declare peace and walk away for the time being .. the Israelis chose the latter.