By: Ahmed ELNAHAS – Montopoli, July 7th 2013.
So.. The
Military Establishment have readjusted the course.. Or perhaps
re-inverted it? I can’t say for certain. Eventually the hurdling events
could lead to such a conclusion, however I’d suggest not be hasty otherwise we
may lose track or thrive ahead without noticing the trail indicators.
What was
the real motivator that drove the Egyptian Brass to intervene firmly, swiftly,
vigilantly and radically? What fears drove the CIA & Co to press Al Sissy
into the decisions he took ever since November last? Where did the Brotherhood
got it all wrong? How would this affect the Arab Spring as a whole? And why the
world is so confused in defining Egypt’s change of régime (revolution or coup)?
Well to
answer all of these interrogatives, and many more; I would settle here to bring
you straight to the bottom line.. Where the conclusion is and whereas the motivators
are Hamas and the Suez Canal; while the trail of
indicators is completely another matter.
At first
here are the motivators:
The
frequent and repeated infiltrations of Hamas militants into Sinai (to pass on directives, instructions and finances to
their peers who evaded captivity in the January 2011 chaotic events).
Of course this could mean training Jihadist fresh recruits anywhere in the
Sinai maze, flourishing arms trade and smuggling of strategic goods and
commodities to a suffering population into the sanctioned Gaza Strip.
The river
of petro-dollars in financial support to Egypt’s Brotherhood Presidency, mostly
originating from the ex Prince of Qatar, having for target to establish a
multitude of giant projects surrounding the Suez Canal strategic zone; and that
is nourishing international fears about the sorts of the Canal and whom shall
have the last word in running it.
Now for
the trail of indicators, since the space is limited, let me just state the
headings and hope that you will elaborate on each as you wish:
·
IMF loan;
·
US annual billion and a half in Military Aids;
·
the uninterrupted chain of communications between
Egypt’s Brass and the Pentagon;
·
the US closed doors diplomatic contacts with the
Brotherhood and with the opposition;
·
Kerry’s repeated visits to Jordan, Israel, Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Egypt;
·
the Supreme Court verdict to reinstate the Ex General
Prosecutor ousted by the Brotherhood;
·
the US firm refusal to bring Mubarak & Co before a
Court Marshall, only a Civil Tribunal so that the defence
may engage in a long trial to gain the needed precious time for prescribing the
vague accusations;
·
the Coptic pressure;
·
the Ethiopian Dam case;
·
the abdication of Al Thany of Qatar to his son Prince
Tamim;
·
the formation of the National Salvation Front;
And on
top of all that, there are the Brotherhood’s unrealistic vision and bad
interpretation to the Egyptian consensus changing moods; because their fatal
mistake was to interpret the 51% in
favour as the votes of devoted Brotherhood’s followers,
overlooking the fact that most of that electorate voted for fear of the return
of the Military Brass on top of the Executive.
Moreover,
by refusing to give an ear to the opposition and the street, the 2nd
ex-President did not report to his employer (the Egyptian People) but gave
all his devotion to execute the Brotherhood’s Supreme Guide instructions,
directives, indications…etc.
So by placing
the supreme strategic targets of the Brotherhood (The Islamic Middle East) as an
immediate national priority rather that providing any sign of consideration to the
people’s urgent needs (Security, Labour, Prices, Wages, Pensions, Health Care, Education,
Gas, Water, Fuel, Energy, Bread, Corruption, Justice, Nile Water, Agriculture,
Industry, Tourism… Etc.); he and the Brotherhood opened the door wide open for
all possible, imaginable and non, scenarios.
In the
meantime Egyptians are dying, women are being raped, priests are killed, Copt houses
are burned, violence is spreading, and all are awaiting the moves of the newly
sworn-in President.
That’s
why I continue to express my refusal to ‘this’ type of Presidential Monarchy as the
model to preserve, because so far it proved so many times and everywhere its
failure to protect its values, manage crisis
or adjust its course except by overpowering FORCE or shrewd CHEAT.
The
System has failed since 1952.. Shall we try something else?
Can the
one who sat on the helm of the Constitutional Court, the man who does not dream his verdicts but examine facts
and draw conclusions to judge by the spirit of the text not by the text itself,
bring the answer?
Pass On The Word.
No comments:
Post a Comment