By: Ahmed
ELNAHAS - Montopoli, January 26th 2014.
In his article entitled “Kissinger Plan for Lebanon: Death by ‘Democracy’” published on EIR* May 27, 2005; Michele Steinberg
wrote:
“...the
Bush Administration’s major—and perhaps only—interest in Lebanon, is to use the
country against Syria. For the neo-conservative fanatics run by Vice President
Dick Cheney, Lebanon is seen as useful for either military strikes against
Syria, or as a staging ground for a special operations regime-change in Syria.
(See EIR, Feb. 25, 2005,
“Lebanon’s Hariri Killed To Make a ‘Clean Break.’ ”)”.
And in the writer’s intent to explain the Kissinger
plan for turning Lebanon into an advanced assault platform against Syria, being
part of his strategy to control the Middle East’s resources (in accordance with the contents of his famous NSM200
of 1974); we can read this most significant passage:
“Another
view, and perhaps the most dangerous, is to let the election proceed without destabilizations
and ultimata
from the
United States about disarming the Shi’ite group Hezbollah. Then, after the election, as was done in
Georgia, Ukraine, and even earlier in Peru, the U.S.-British imperial forces
would use their covert and semi-open democracy funds to unleash Jacobin mobs in the streets of Lebanon to overturn
the election. The stage would be set for another tragedy”.
Today, and after closely observing what has been going
on the Egyptian territories, I can conclude that my doubts about a similar
parallel pattern - perhaps even an identical twin copy - if not completely founded,
however they are amazingly justifiable.
Pass On The Word.
No comments:
Post a Comment